Blame Clinton, she started the shit

You still have to blame the attackee for being attacked.

It's not that unusual, frankly.  

In the 1970s and '80s, many working- and middle-class white Democrats voted for Republicans, in part because of racial politics, but also because they resented their own party's drift toward what they perceived as domination by a white elite. To put it crudely, the beer drinkers distrusted the wine drinkers as people who, at best, didn't understand their everyday concerns or, at worst, looked down on them as racist. Clinton's presidency for a time seemed to heal the rift. Yet even after President Bush had lost favor among many middle- and working-class voters, Republicans were able to tap this vein with attacks on 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry as a windsurfer who "looks French."

If the fissure opens wide now, Democrats seriously diminish their chances for winning in the fall. And the roots of defeat will lie partly in the rancor that Clinton and Obama stirred up themselves.

But this happened right out in the open and the Clintons were caught dagger in hand. They can't even blame hip-hop like Imus did, not when they brought Bob Johnson into the mix. Yet the media insists on indicting the Obama campaign.

Why?