Quote of note:
Except relief and reconstruction never seem to work like that. When I was in Sri Lanka six months after the tsunami, many survivors told me that the reconstruction was victimizing them all over again. A council of the country's most prominent businesspeople had been put in charge of the process, and they were handing the coast over to tourist developers at a frantic pace. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of poor fishing people were still stuck in sweltering inland camps, patrolled by soldiers with machine guns and entirely dependent on relief agencies for food and water. They called reconstruction "the second tsunami."
Let the People Rebuild New Orleans
Naomi Klein
On September 4, six days after Katrina hit, I saw the first glimmer of hope. "The people of New Orleans will not go quietly into the night, scattering across this country to become homeless in countless other cities while federal relief funds are funneled into rebuilding casinos, hotels, chemical plants.... We will not stand idly by while this disaster is used as an opportunity to replace our homes with newly built mansions and condos in a gentrified New Orleans."
The statement came from Community Labor United, a coalition of low-income groups in New Orleans. It went on to demand that a committee made up of evacuees "oversee FEMA, the Red Cross and other organizations collecting resources on behalf of our people.... We are calling for evacuees from our community to actively participate in the rebuilding of New Orleans."
It's a radical concept: The $10.5 billion released by Congress and the $500 million raised by private charities doesn't actually belong to the relief agencies or the government; it belongs to the victims. The agencies entrusted with the money should be accountable to them. Put another way, the people Barbara Bush tactfully described as "underprivileged anyway" just got very rich.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Not if even progressive
Not if even progressive bloggers shoot the idea down. Just what we need.
No. The title stays.I'm not
No. I don't do fantasy; the title stays.
I'm not shooting down the idea. I'm saying it's not going to happen.
But here's a thought: this
But here's a thought: this is the first disagreement you've had with me here that didn't start by saying I or my comment was stupid...and in it you decide to give me an order on my own site?
It doesn't work. Information works, commentary works. Orders don't. Neither does calling my ideas stupid, but that's easier to deal with than attitude.
That's more than one thought, but hey...my site.
Whether it's an order or
Whether it's an order or not, the question is...is it right?
Now if you say, "no, this isn't right" then it doesn't matter whether it comes as an order, or a request.
It seems to me that the goal of your site is encapsulated by the statement I see when I entered:
"...freedom is never a final act, but a continuing evolving process to higher and higher levels of human, social, economic, political and religious relationships."
Are you promoting freedom by shooting down an idea that you yourself agree with? An idea that isn't as inane as say...reparations?
The reason I didn't start off by noting that your statement was "stupid" was because in this case it was NOT (as opposed to the others). The argument contained in your statement is eminently logical and intelligent. BUT if you are interested in moving towards freedom, towards practical solutions, I don't see how shooting down an idea gets us there.
In fact, it moves us in the opposite direction, by demobilizing people who may be predisposed to aid in this endeavor. In this way it doesn't matter whether it is "your site" or not, anymore than it mattered that those "looter" pictures were on Yahoo's site.
Ah. Â IRRESPONSIBLE is the
Ah.
IRRESPONSIBLE is the word.
Are you promoting freedom by
Is it going to happen? That's the question.
As for reparations, my own position is, we deserve it and will not get it. However, it is useful to understand the justification for both reparation and the refusal to acknowledge they are due. Pretty much the same position I hold here.
As for the stupidity, you ain't won a single dispute. Nuff. Said.
"Is it going to happen?Â
"Is it going to happen? That's the question."
No it isn't...not to you. You have an answer already right? For me, the question is COULD it happen? This is an interesting moment in time...an opportunity that might not last that long, but I'll say YES. For what it is worth, I think A P Randolph would be with me. This isn't reparations at ALL, and here the future is not written. I thought you understood that.
This isn't reparations at
I do. I thought YOU understood that things take time. The rebuilding of New Orleans means so much money to so many established forces that it will not wait. By the time you pull your coalition together the contract will be handed out, plans laid and YOU will be cast as an obstacle.
Randolph had different issues to deal with...much respect, but I don't look to him as a model as much as an inspiration. And he didn't wait for a crisis to get all transformative.
Look at who you're dealing with. A government that ACTIVELY does not give a fuck and a citizenry that ACTIVELY rejects rationality. And a crew that's on the ground NOW, with the connections, resources, government support and a legitimate claim to the 20% of New Orleans that survived.
It will not work because there isn't time for it to work. At best you'll get something as symbolic as General Powell. So get your shit together, use this as a seed, a reason, to organize long term. Because without that organization any significant shift in power (which is what this is about, what this will take to accomplish) is a wet dream.
Not a single dispute.And I
Not a single dispute.
And I disagreed with you without insults because were are ostensibly on the same side. You think you can do that too?
Do what? Where did I
Do what? Where did I insult YOU?
Where did I insult YOU?
Somewhere in the hyperthread...the one that extended over three months. I'm not going to dig it out, but I do remember "stupid" started showing up after that point.
People of the Word.
What does setting them up for failure do?
I've said that any number of
I've said that any number of statements were stupid here. Things you've said. Craig has said. Others.
To People of the Word, yes.
To People of the Word, yes.
And how about that setting
And how about that setting them up for failure thing?
Here I'm taking a few
Here I'm taking a few leaps:
Given your assumptions, I
Given your assumptions, I understand your reactions. I think, though, you're judging the single frame as though it were the whole movie.
I try to bring the facts that I see and explain my understanding of things as clearly as possible. Sometimes that means I have to go against the grain.
Which grain? People are
Which grain? People are already skeptical that the money is going to go where it should, and they already are prone to believe that bush is going to give new orleans to his cronies. In the mass pubic there are probably very few people who believe that New Orleans can be transformed for the better.
But at some level we've got
All that from a headline?
How many people here think my headlines are the last word on my positions?
"The grain" is the belief that one can construct a reality based on mere verbiage.
You construct a reality
Well, there's our
Well, there's our disagreement. Words affect what you think reality is. That's a far cry from constructing a reality.
There was a faith healer from Beale
Who said, "Although pain is not real<
When the point of a pin
Penetrateth my skin
I dislike what I fancy I feel
It's clear that P6 has
It's clear that P6 has decided to be cynical about the opportunity. Don't waste your breath.
Well, there's one member of
Well, there's one member of the audience lost...