Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

Hey, there's a thought...never happen, though

Quote of note:

Except relief and reconstruction never seem to work like that. When I was in Sri Lanka six months after the tsunami, many survivors told me that the reconstruction was victimizing them all over again. A council of the country's most prominent businesspeople had been put in charge of the process, and they were handing the coast over to tourist developers at a frantic pace. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of poor fishing people were still stuck in sweltering inland camps, patrolled by soldiers with machine guns and entirely dependent on relief agencies for food and water. They called reconstruction "the second tsunami."

Let the People Rebuild New Orleans
Naomi Klein

On September 4, six days after Katrina hit, I saw the first glimmer of hope. "The people of New Orleans will not go quietly into the night, scattering across this country to become homeless in countless other cities while federal relief funds are funneled into rebuilding casinos, hotels, chemical plants.... We will not stand idly by while this disaster is used as an opportunity to replace our homes with newly built mansions and condos in a gentrified New Orleans."

The statement came from Community Labor United, a coalition of low-income groups in New Orleans. It went on to demand that a committee made up of evacuees "oversee FEMA, the Red Cross and other organizations collecting resources on behalf of our people.... We are calling for evacuees from our community to actively participate in the rebuilding of New Orleans."

It's a radical concept: The $10.5 billion released by Congress and the $500 million raised by private charities doesn't actually belong to the relief agencies or the government; it belongs to the victims. The agencies entrusted with the money should be accountable to them. Put another way, the people Barbara Bush tactfully described as "underprivileged anyway" just got very rich.

Not if even progressive

Not if even progressive bloggers shoot the idea down.  Just what we need.

Change the title.  "Here's a thought..."

No. The title stays.I'm not

No. I don't do fantasy; the title stays.

I'm not shooting down the idea. I'm saying it's not going to happen. 

But here's a thought: this

But here's a thought: this is the first disagreement you've had with me here that didn't start by saying I or my comment was stupid...and in it you decide to give me an order on my own site?

It doesn't work. Information works, commentary works. Orders don't. Neither does calling my ideas stupid, but that's easier to deal with than attitude.

That's more than one thought, but hey...my site. 

Whether it's an order or

Whether it's an order or not, the question is...is it right?

Now if you say, "no, this isn't right" then it doesn't matter whether it comes as an order, or a request.

It seems to me that the goal of your site is encapsulated by the statement I see when I entered:

"...freedom is never a final act, but a continuing evolving process to higher and higher levels of human, social, economic, political and religious relationships."

Are you promoting freedom by shooting down an idea that you yourself agree with?  An idea that isn't as inane as say...reparations?  

The reason I didn't start off by noting that your statement was "stupid" was because in this case it was NOT (as opposed to the others).  The argument contained in your statement is eminently logical and intelligent.  BUT if you are interested in moving towards freedom, towards practical solutions, I don't see how shooting down an idea gets us there.   

 In fact, it moves us in the opposite direction, by demobilizing people who may be predisposed to aid in this endeavor.  In this way it doesn't matter whether it is "your site" or not, anymore than it mattered that those "looter" pictures were on Yahoo's site. 

Ah.  IRRESPONSIBLE is the

Ah.

 IRRESPONSIBLE is the word.

Are you promoting freedom by

Are you promoting freedom by shooting down an idea that you yourself agree with?  An idea that isn't as inane as say...reparations? 

 

Is it going to happen? That's the question.

As for reparations, my own position is, we deserve it and will not get it. However, it is useful to understand the justification for both reparation and the refusal to acknowledge they are due. Pretty much the same position I hold here.

As for the stupidity, you ain't won a single dispute. Nuff. Said. 

"Is it going to happen? 

"Is it going to happen?  That's the question."

 No it isn't...not to you.  You have an answer already right?  For me, the question is COULD it happen?  This is an interesting moment in time...an opportunity that might not last that long, but I'll say YES.  For what it is worth, I think A P Randolph would be with me.  This isn't reparations at ALL, and here the future is not written.  I thought you understood that. 

This isn't reparations at

This isn't reparations at ALL, and here the future is not written.  I thought you understood that.

I do. I thought YOU understood that things take time. The rebuilding of New Orleans means so much money to so many established forces that it will not wait. By the time you pull your coalition together the contract will be handed out, plans laid and YOU will be cast as an obstacle.

Randolph had different issues to deal with...much respect, but I don't look to him as a model as much as an inspiration. And he didn't wait for a crisis to get all transformative. 

Look at who you're dealing with. A government that ACTIVELY does not give a fuck and a citizenry that ACTIVELY rejects rationality. And a crew that's on the ground NOW, with the connections, resources, government support and a legitimate claim to the 20% of New Orleans that survived.

It will not work because there isn't time for it to work. At best you'll get something as symbolic as General Powell. So get your shit together, use this as a seed, a reason, to organize long term. Because without that organization any significant shift in power (which is what this is about, what this will take to accomplish) is a wet dream.

Not a single dispute.And I

Not a single dispute.

And I disagreed with you without insults because were are ostensibly on the same side. You think you can do that too? 

Do what?  Where did I

Do what?  Where did I insult YOU?  

I'm not interested in "winning" anything.  I don't perceive our "disputes" as involving "winning" or "losing."  I perceive them as me pointing out gaps in logic in the QUICKEST way possible.  I've never called YOU or anyone here out of their name.  I've called STATEMENTS stupid...because in my mind they WERE.  
Here?  A tragedy like this provides a window of opportunity for people from a variety of backgrounds.  To the extent that the social opportunity structure is a function of not only material resources, but also cultural resources (which are themselves a partial function of language), "never gonna happen" language demobilizes citizens and prevents them from both short term AND LONG TERM organizing.

Where did I insult YOU?

Where did I insult YOU? 

 

Somewhere in the hyperthread...the one that extended over three months. I'm not going to dig it out, but I do remember "stupid" started showing up after that point.

To the extent that the social opportunity structure is a function of not only material resources, but also cultural resources (which are themselves a partial function of language), "never gonna happen" language demobilizes citizens and prevents them from both short term AND LONG TERM organizing.

People of the Word. 

What does setting them up for failure do? 

I've said that any number of

I've said that any number of statements were stupid here.  Things you've said.  Craig has said.  Others.

Are you and your statements the same?

To People of the Word, yes.

To People of the Word, yes.

And how about that setting

And how about that setting them up for failure thing?

Here I'm taking a few

Here I'm taking a few leaps:

1.  I am assuming that you are an opinion leader among black people who actively use the internet for information.
I don't know this.  I know how i MIGHT measure this, but would need to measure not only the viewership here but other places.
2.  I am assuming an elite model of public opinion.
Elites don't tell people what to do necessarily.  But they CAN shape thinking.  Not a lot, but enough.  The research here is pretty clear.  Material circumstances influence people's lives and their opinions...but language has a significant influence as well.  Asking people about Affirmative Action is not quite the same as asking them about "equal opportunity" or "racial preferences" even though there is a blurry line between the three concepts.   
3.  Katrina is an historic opportunity.
Yes, contracts have already been awarded.  But this is the first time that a city, a REGION is being rebuilt almost from scratch.  I believe that this will happen a few more times--I see SF going down, SD going down, and perhaps another couple of cities.  What happens here though sets the tone for what follows.  A number of organizations across the country, from The Praxis Project on down, are attempting to use this to mobilize local and national level forces to get a conversation started AND ALSO TO GET SOME POLICIES INITIATED.
These are my central assumptions.  To the degree that you are an elite, and an opinion shaper, your words carry weight.  Given the opportunity that Katrina represents, AND the forces arrayed against us, your words should be used with more care.  To the degree that mass level activity is influenced by elite level discourse your language plays a role in shaping the response to Katrina.
 

Given your assumptions, I

Given your assumptions, I understand your reactions. I think, though, you're judging the single frame as though it were the whole movie. 

I try to bring the facts that I see and explain my understanding of things as clearly as possible. Sometimes that means I have to go against the grain.

Which grain?  People are

Which grain?  People are already skeptical that the money is going to go where it should, and they already are prone to believe that bush is going to give new orleans to his cronies.  In the mass pubic there are probably very few people who believe that New Orleans can be transformed for the better.  

And this is the way it always is.  Ask southerners during Jim Crow whether things would get better, and they'd say (black southerners i mean), no.  Very few of them could imagine anything different.
There are always a group of people who are willing and able to imagine something new.  Sometimes we are in a position to expand that pool, and sometimes we are in a position to not only expand that pool, but to actually get victories of some sort.  The future isn't written, even if we totally LOSE here.  But at some point we've got to go against the norm that continually critiques without providing an alternative vision of what's possible if we work.

But at some level we've got

But at some level we've got to go against the norm that continually critiques without providing an alternative vision of what's possible if we work.

 

All that from a headline?

How many people here think my headlines are the last word on my positions?

"The grain" is the belief that one can construct a reality based on mere verbiage.

You construct a reality

You construct a reality based on verbiage and work (among other things).  Work can be restrained by verbiage.  

Well, there's our

Well, there's our disagreement. Words affect what you think reality is. That's a far cry from constructing a reality.

There was a faith healer from Beale
Who said, "Although pain is not real<

When the point of a pin
Penetrateth my skin

I dislike what I fancy I feel 

 

It's clear that P6 has

It's clear that P6 has decided to be cynical about the opportunity. Don't waste your breath.

Well, there's one member of

Well, there's one member of the audience lost...

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye