Quote of note:
The University of Maryland study received a great deal of attention and should have been a call to action for state leaders, but no solutions have been implemented. The General Assembly, despite conducting hearings on the issue, never passed legislation to deal with the inequalities highlighted in the study.
Gov. Robert Ehrlich, who lifted my moratorium on executions after assuming office despite acknowledging that race "plays a part all the way through the process," named Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele as the new administration's point man on the issue. The lieutenant governor promised to conduct an assessment of our state's death penalty. To date, he has not.
Despite being ignored by the current administration, issues raised by the study remain.
The Value of Black Life in Maryland
By Parris Glendening
Sunday, December 18, 2005; B07
In the eight years I served as governor of Maryland, I found the power to decide which condemned prisoners would live and which would die the most awesome and emotionally grueling of all my duties. I faced this decision four times.
I believed in the death penalty when I became governor and took seriously my constitutional responsibility to uphold Maryland law. I presided over two executions, those of Flint Gregory Hunt and Tyrone Gilliam. Both were black men whose victims were white. I heard from many civil rights leaders who rightly pointed out that this racial combination dominated cases on our state's death row, even though African Americans were and continue to be the victims in nearly 80 percent of homicides.
So in 1999 I commissioned a study of race and death sentencing from the University of Maryland, believing it my responsibility to ensure that justice was truly blind when applying this ultimate punishment.
Baltimore County was singled out as having a significantly higher rate of death sentences than other jurisdictions in the state. Murderers in Baltimore County were 26 times more likely to be sentenced to death than killers in Baltimore City and 14 times more likely than murderers in Montgomery County.
The significant racial disparities are troubling. Cases in which the victim was white were almost twice as likely to result in the death penalty as cases in which the victim was black, and blacks who killed whites were 2 1/2 times more likely to be sentenced to death than whites who killed whites.
These results lead to the unfortunate conclusion that we value white life more than black life. Intentional or not -- and I believe it is not -- this is an indefensible and untenable position for the state. Whether one supports or opposes the death penalty in principle, all reasonable people understand that before we exercise the ultimate sanction, we must be confident that the system is, at a minimum, fair and accurate.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Glendenning, overall, is a
Glendenning, overall, is a putz.
I have to agree with the critics of the study.
Baltimore is the murder capital of the state of Maryland. Black people are those who are killing the most and being killed the most. Baltimore, a majority Black city, doesn't put the death penalty on the table for those people with murder.
So, if the area with the largest number of murders doesn't put the death penalty on the table, not by law but by practice, what do you think the results will show when another area does?
The real issue is Michael
The real issue is Michael Steele promised to study what is a very important issue, and failed to live up to his promise. We should demand answers for why he hasn't taken the lead on addressing this issue.
While it is important to ask
While it is important to ask that question, it's not the real issue.
Regardless of what any
Regardless of what any critics of the study said, Ehrlich said race plays a part in the process. To me, the real issue is the ability to say that and then do nothing about it.
He did say it, but it's not
He did say it, but it's not in the context of race affecting death penality judgements, it was in the context of who is committing the crimes. Additionally, what was missing was his comment on class being a part of it as well.
 He did say it, but it's
If it wasn't in the context of race affecting death penalty judgements, why did he assign Steele to look into race affecting death penalty judgements?
And do you really think class considerations change anything?
To me, the real issue is the
To me, the real issue is the ability to say that and then do nothing about it.
Getting elected and staying elected is more important than doing something about a manifestly unfair criminal justice system and the imposition of the death penalty, which, of course, would greatly anger the mostly white mob that hankers for these ritualized sacrifices.