Scholastic's press release says
“After a thorough review of the original guide that we offered online to about 25,000 high school teachers, we determined that the materials did not meet our high standards for dealing with controversial issues,” said Dick Robinson, Chairman, President and CEO of Scholastic. “At the same time, we believe that developing critical thinking and media literacy skills is crucial for students in today’s society in order to participate fully in our democracy and that a program such as ‘The Path to 9/11’ provides a very ‘teachable moment’ for developing these skills at the high school level. We encourage teachers not to shy away from the controversy surrounding the program, but rather to engage their students in meaningful, in-depth discussion.”
The new guide clearly states that Scholastic had no involvement with developing the ABC docudrama, and that the company is not promoting the program, but that the program can provide a springboard to discussion about the issues leading up to 9/11, terrorism and the Middle East. The guide will focus on three issues:
1. Media Literacy - what is a docudrama; how does it differ from a documentary; what are the differences between factual reporting and a dramatization?
2. Background to 9/11 - what are some of the causes of unrest in the Middle East and other parts of the world that give rise to attacks on the U.S. and other countries?
3. Geography and Culture -- there is a long history of conflict in the Middle East. How well do students understand each of the countries involved and what influences their behavior?
Scholastic has been providing free educational materials for use in the classroom in conjunction with television programs and films since the 1950’s. Classroom discussion guides have also been created in the past to support discussion of major events such as the Challenger and Columbia shuttle disasters, the shootings at Columbine and many others.
There is exactly one topic this propaganda movie support the study of: media literacy. And that can still be studied if they pull the damn thing. Seriously, why present false information, then explain it? Why not teach the background, geography and culture from cleaner sources?
LATER: I just read the study guide...other than making kids watch "The Path to 9/11," it's not bad. There should be something out there that could replace the propaganda piece. Or let's gets some equal and opposite forces working...let them watch "The Path to 9/11" and "Farenheit 9/11." Have the students work with both. Thing might actually be useful in teaching critical thought if they did that, but nooooo....
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo