Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

There is a problem with Iraq Study Group's suggestions


The members of the Iraq Study Group may not have come up with all the right answers; in their pursuit of unanimity, they may have settled for split-the-difference compromises where only one straight path makes sense.

...and sums up the whole problem. 

Presidential ingratitude
December 9, 2006

PRESIDENT BUSH let the ball roll under his glove Thursday when he hinted that he has little enthusiasm for the recommendations of the commission co-chaired by former secretary of state James Baker and the former House International Relations Committee chairman Lee Hamilton. Whatever might be questioned in any particular recommendation of the report, the bipartisan spirit and consensus-building purpose of the Iraq Study Group deserve grateful praise from the president, not a defensive rejection.

Had he shown proper appreciation for the work of the panel's 10 senior members and their aides, Bush could have made his own task easier as a commander in chief trying to cope with the disastrous consequences of his own war of choice. Had he enlisted in the Iraq Study Group's common-sense project of seeking to limit the damage from his administration's blunders in Iraq, Bush might be part of the solution -- rather than the continuing cause -- of a daunting problem.

The members of the Iraq Study Group may not have come up with all the right answers; in their pursuit of unanimity, they may have settled for split-the-difference compromises where only one straight path makes sense. But in their bipartisan spirit of cooperation, they gave Americans a much-needed reminder of how statecraft once was conducted -- and how it ought to be conducted once again.

So even though the report itself warns that there is no guarantee of success for its proposals for regional diplomacy, for example, or its imposition of milestones and deadlines on the Iraqi government, or its plan for redeploying and withdrawing US military forces, the nation clearly needed a lucid analysis of realistic options for halting the loss of American blood, treasure, and goodwill in Iraq.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye