Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

That's because the majority is unbalanced


The public seems to have noticed the shift. The percentage who said the court is "too conservative" grew from 19 percent to 31 percent in the past two years, while those who said it is "generally balanced in its decisions" declined from 55 percent to 47 percent....

[A] majority disagreed with the court's decision that sharply restricted the ability of local school boards to use race when making school assignments to achieve diverse student bodies. Fifty-six percent of those polled disapproved of the decision; 40 percent approved.

Three out of four blacks disapproved of the court's ruling in the race case, as did a narrow majority of whites. Seven out of 10 Democrats disagreed with the ruling, while Republicans and independents both were evenly split.

"People really don't want to go backwards on civil rights," said Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, which focuses on judicial nominations.

Fewer See Balance in Court's Decisions
Bush Nominees Have Made Panel 'Too Conservative' for Many, Poll Indicates
By Robert Barnes and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, July 29, 2007; A03

About half of the public thinks the Supreme Court is generally balanced in its decisions, but a growing number of Americans say the court has become "too conservative" in the two years since President Bush began nominating justices, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Nearly a third of the public -- 31 percent -- thinks the court is too far to the right, a noticeable jump since the question was last asked in July 2005. That's when Bush nominated John G. Roberts Jr. to the court and, in the six-month period that followed, the Senate approved Roberts as chief justice and confirmed Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

The two have proved to be reliably conservative justices, and the increasingly polarized court this year moved to uphold restraints on abortion, restrict student speech rights and limit the ability of school districts to use race in student assignments, among other issues.

The public seems to have noticed the shift. The percentage who said the court is "too conservative" grew from 19 percent to 31 percent in the past two years, while those who said it is "generally balanced in its decisions" declined from 55 percent to 47 percent.

"I think it shows that we're at a tipping point in time," said Ralph G. Neas, president of the liberal People for the American Way. "And it's why a major priority for us over the next 16 months will be to emphasize the importance of the Supreme Court and why it should be an important factor in voting for president."

But conservative activists looking at the political consequences of the past term say the public is ambivalent about the two rulings that have most marked the court's turn to the right -- upholding the ban on the procedure sometimes called partial-birth abortion and restricting the use of race in school assignments.

The difference could lie in which side is most successful in framing the court's actions to a public that pays more attention to the president and Congress.

The Media Has it all wrong; the poll is worthless.

The media only focuses on whether or not the court has shifted, and pays no attention on whether or not the decisions were well-reasoned and correct.

Here's MY Take

Enjoy the link. The

Enjoy the link.

The decisions we're getting now are well reasoned but incorrect because they are reasoned with specific ends in mind that really can't be accomplished without a time machine.

supreme court decisions

we've had 40 years of liberal decisions so lets see what a l current traditional ideas can do for this country. Blacks are paranoid about any authority anyway so way listen to them??

we've had 40 years of


we've had 40 years of liberal decisions

And forty years of Conservative lies about obeying the law.

Blacks are paranoid about any authority anyway so way listen to them??

Yet here your stank ass is, trying to be annoying.

No reponse, necessary, idiot. I let one example of each type of racism through, so folks know I recognize it. Nothing like it will ever be approved here again.

Clarity

Dear strangers: 

If you come to my site to say something about The Blacks, I don't want to hear it and my readers will not hear it because I won't approve it. And I can always tell when you're talking about The Blacks because if you don't get across the fact that you're talking about The Blacks, there'd be no point in your saying anything. Correct?

You got your personal opinion about an issue...as long as that issue isn't Black folks...feel free to hold forth. That's the basic rule for strangers.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye