Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

The renegrofication of Condi

in

Rikyrah pointed out this Rush and Malloy piece in the NY Daily News. Normally I just drop such stuff in the press releases pile, but we have a special place in our heart for Dr. Rice.

No, wait, that was Prometheus 5 who felt that way.

Well, I'm in the middle of it now.

Dr. Rice is trying to separate herself from the Bush regime but she's not going to have as easy a time of it as, say, a Republican senator (which says a lot). She's as much a part of the Bushista regime as Cheney, so it's little wonder she's taken a similar tack in image management...a multi-pronged campaign eerily similar to the sort of campaign D.C. lobbyist regularly offer

Now Ms. Rice is working hard to reshape her legacy in her remaining 16 months in office. She is cooperating with a range of authors who have lined up to write books about her: “The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy,” by The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler, comes out next week, while “Condoleezza Rice: An American Life,” by The New York Times’s Elisabeth Bumiller is due out in December. “Twice as Good: Condoleezza Rice and Her Path to Power,” by Marcus Mabry, now an editor at The Times, came out in May.

Of course these authors "enjoyed unprecedented access to [their] subject", and of course that's no assurance YOU get the whole, or real, story.

Part of her problem is trying to undo the previously issued spin

There was a time when, perhaps more than Hillary Rodham Clinton or Barack Obama, Condoleezza Rice seemed to have the best shot at becoming the first woman or the first African-American to be president.

Temple 3 worked that aspect to death, so we shall include it by reference. Besides, it's the reshaping of the soft stuff I'm finding so interesting.

She does let her hair down. Once at a party Blacker threw, Condi kicked off her shoes and started dancing. Wanting to show his partner how firm Rice's behind was, Blacker postulated that if he aimed a quarter at her butt, it would bounce right off like a rocket.

"He was right," says Kessler. "[Rice] didn't realize what he had done until everyone was laughing hysterically. She was flattered and proud."

Being flattered and proud as everyone laughs at the quarter bouncing off her ass? Really? Though we have been aware of Condi's ass since 2004, Condi the Sex Kitten does not parse. Who thinks this helps a woman of her stature?

The clerk showed her costume jewelry. Rice asked to see something nicer, prompting the clerk to whisper some sass under her breath.

Blacker remembers Rice tearing the woman to shreds.

"Let's get one thing straight," he recalls her saying. "You are behind the counter because you have to work for minimum wage. I'm on this side asking to see the good jewelry because I make considerably more."

A manager quickly brought Rice better baubles.

Someone who thinks she needs renegrofication. Which requires her ass be capable of bouncing quarters, I guess. And some understated bling. I keep wondering how Madeline Albright would react if someone pitched a quarter at her ass and the room burst into laughter.

I actually wish her luck. I've never felt hostile toward her as human being; I think she has internal class issues.It's like the first time I flew business class...I was like, damn, free drinks, slippers, video games, they must give head in first class. You really hate the subway for about a week after that.

Her loyalty is pretty typical of a person that was lifted from brutal repression (which the Confederate States of America was, especially for a developing child of her perspicacity) directly, almost with no transition, to the central circles of influence. I decided long ago her major issue is that she's a loyal employee.

Good insights. I have been

Good insights. I have been predicting for a while that Rice would attempt to separate herself from the actual parameters of the Bush legacy when it no longer bolstered her place in the history books.

Dr. Rice and Stanford University

The opposition that is surfacing to having Dr. Rice return to Stanford reminds me of the stories that I heard about Henry Kissinger's attempts to return to Harvard University after his stint on behalf of world peace in the Nixon Administration. He was told privately to forget about it because the resistence from the faculty was so strong. Rice will probably get an appointment at the Hoover Institute if she does not return to her post at Stanford. She and Br. Shelby Steele can spend time discussing the end of blackness and its meaning for U.S. foreign policy in sub-Sahran Africa.Cool

Her loyalty is pretty

Her loyalty is pretty typical of a person that was lifted from brutal repression...

Dr. Rice did not directly experience any of the racial oppression nor did she or members of her immediate family participate in any efforts to lift the jackboot off of the collective necks of black folks. Dr. Rice's father publicy condemned the civil rights demonstrators. Her parents were so enamored of her and thought that she was so special that they chose not to have any additional children because they felt it would be unfair to her.  

Jim Crow counts as brutal

Jim Crow counts as brutal repression.

Condi

Well, looks like the Donkeys are trying to run Condi out of town.

The jewelry store story is an old one. It happened when she was in Stanford back in the nineties.
Rice remains extremely popular within the Republican party, which is basically all Giuliani needs from her. Democrats understand this, which is why I suspect that the Helene Cooper hit piece hit the Times today. I suspect that Hillary is going to wind up having to put Barak on her ticket, and Rudy will counter that with Rice, who is both smarter and quicker than the young man.
So I suspect you'll start seeing a spate of negative stories from the Democratic Party press about Rice. Not that they'll work. The RNC has anticipated this for several months. If you look at the Cooper story, it basically repeated the usual internet tropes about Rice that result from someone spending too much time googling Condoleezza Rice on Usenet. Cooper then surrounded the usual "known facts" with interviews with hostile commentators. This was not a friendly story, nor was it meant to be.
Part of the problem Republicans have with Rice is that we believe that she's too passive and apolitical. In other words, she takes the SOS job seriously, which in the long run is a good thing for the country. However, with a news media that is completely focused on getting Hillary Clinton's ass in the White House, that is not always healthy for her politically. Remember one thing, though. One of the reasons people in the Party and the Administration do like her is that she does her job and doesn't leak. She has been responsible for several breakthroughs with Japan, India, and North Korea, and may yet forstall a conflict with the Ayatollahs. She has been able to seperate herself from Bush without trashing him personally, because she remains his friend. Don't think this hasn't gone noticed within the Republican Party.
Liberals don't get this.
Condi won't return to Stanford, per se, I suspect. Rice is the only Republican from the Bush White House, aside from Tony Snow, who remains durably popular. Despite her denials, she knows this, and will probably accept a Vice-Presidential nod from Rudy. Rudy needs an adult around who knows foreign policy and who can temper his immediate impulse to send in the B-52's when the Iranians get squirrely. She's the most logical choice to be the VP in a Rudy Administration, if only because Jeb Bush has the wrong last name.
This hit piece that came out this morning should have been a red flag to anyone looking at the Republican nomination process just who the Hillary Campaign is really afraid that Rudy might decide to run with.
The lesson? I've been in politics for a while. Don't believe everything you read in the New York Times.

does it?


Jim Crow counts as brutal repression.

how about for those many who had grown to "know" and "accept" their place in Jim Crow society? I believe the term of derision for such folks was "responsible negros". I ask this thinking about members of non-brahmin/non-kshatriya castes in india who do not violently oppose their assigned lot in that life.

such acceptance goes very far to account for the "hear no, see no, speak no" level of loyalty that mademoiselle rice has exhibited, and, the acceptance endorsement of the status quo American aristocracy by negro conservatives who have always viewed her as an exemplar and sincerely wonder why many of us do not.

Rice Apolitical?

Part of the problem Republicans have with Rice is that we believe that she's too passive and apolitical. In other words, she takes the SOS job seriously...

"Birth pangs of the new Middle East" -  Secretary of State Rice's response to the bombing and shelling of civilian sites by the Israeli military.  

 

Political Bona Fides

Many of us who post on this site have been in politics for a while, Section9. If you are under the age of 40 then I have been in politics longer than you have been out of your mother's womb. What arrogance!

Jim Crow counts as brutal

Jim Crow counts as brutal repression.

Yes, it does but I would be hesitant to describe Dr. Rice's contact with the day-to-day experience of Jim Crow as extensive. 

pt: Those pinkframed

pt:

Those pinkframed comments aren't public yet.

Section9

I suspect that Hillary is going to wind up having to put Barak on her ticket, and Rudy will counter that with Rice, who is both smarter and quicker than the young man.

That is such a bizarre suggestion. And yet, we are talking about the party that ONLY looked for Black candidates to face Obama in the Senate race. That they settled on Alan Keyes shows how racialistic the Republican party is. They may well want to run Condi to "balance" Obama.

She may be a loyal employee, but is she really crazy enough to do that? Do you really think the party of the Southern Strategy is ready to run a pro-abortion cross-dresser who backed Bernie Kerek and has the NYC Fire Dept saying he overstates his involvement is the 9/11 recovery, and put a Black woman a heartbeat from the Presidency?

Jim Crow counts as brutal


Jim Crow counts as brutal repression.

how about for those many who had grown to "know" and "accept" their place in Jim Crow society?

Those positions were created by the brutal repression.

Those positions were created

Those positions were created by the brutal repression.

Yes and no. The Jim Crow system created the efficient conditions for those willing to "know" and "accept" their place in Jim Crow society but those individuals, black and white, who accepted these roles fostered the sufficient conditions to make the system work. All of them could have acted otherwise. The conditions they were born into and inherited were only contingent realities. The Civil Rights Movement showed that these conditions were not fixed, glacial realities.

What I'm going to say will probably come across as sexist

But, from woman to woman, it's time for Condi to GET PAID.

It's time for her to play on whatever cache she has built up over the years, and get married. I'm sure there's some rich guy out there who wouldn't mind her as his Trophy Wife. Since she's past child bearing years, they don't have to worry about that. But, I'm sure that she would be an asset as someone's Trophy Wife.

Yes, I said it.

You know, it was always bizarre for me, the choice of Keyes

That is such a bizarre suggestion. And yet, we are talking about the party that ONLY looked for Black candidates to face Obama in the Senate race. That they settled on Alan Keyes shows how racialistic the Republican party is. They may well want to run Condi to "balance" Obama.******

 

It was very obvious that they weren't serious - the Illinois or national GOP. Why choose Keyes - because they wanted it to be a farce. If they were actually serious, then why not choose someone who had actually been elected to public office - like J.C. Watts, who served his Congressional District well and had been reelected several times, or why not Michael Steele, who, at the time, was a sitting Lt. Governor? IF the GOP had actually been serious, they could have easily imported one or both of them, and they wouldn't have been the farce that was Keyes.

 

 

She may be a loyal employee, but is she really crazy enough to do that? Do you really think the party of the Southern Strategy is ready to run a pro-abortion cross-dresser who backed Bernie Kerek and has the NYC Fire Dept saying he overstates his involvement is the 9/11 recovery, and put a Black woman a heartbeat from the Presidency? **************

 

Rudy don't like Black people. He's never choose her. He'll choose plastic Flipping Mitt.

I think J.C. Watts is done

Steele thought he had something better in the works. And I think J.C. Watts is done with all that. I think he was a true believer, got disappointed and decided to take his connections and cash out. And god bless him for it.

I've been in politics since 1972

...so I've been around awhile. Knocked on doors for Tricky Dick, and lived to regret it.

Please cut the self-righteousness. I was trying to have a reasonable poltical discussion with people here. I'm not being arrogant at all, just stating the facts as I see them. I can't help how you react to that. Sorry.

Giuliani will be our nominee: take that to the bank.

This scares Democrats. Hillary's entire strategy was built around running against Elmer Gantry: George Allen. Well, Allen got in touch with his Inner Macaca and lost to Jim Webb. That blew a hole wide open for Rudy, who is leading in all the big primary states, and will probably catch on to do respectably well in New Hampshire and Iowa. If you look at the national polling, Rudy remains ahead of the competition, Fred, who is having trouble getting his race off the ground. Mitt Romney exudes phoniness in a time that voters want authenticity.

Rudy has the authenticity that the others lack, and our rank and file voters are responding to this!!!

You don't get this because most if not all of you are rank and file, base Democratic voters who know very little about the rank and file Republican voter and what gets him to the polls. It is extremely hard for you to believe that a single, black, conservative female such as Rice could be wildly popular with our base voters, or that our base voters could turn out for Rudy. Yet in both cases, both of these things are true of our people. Further, our voters assume that the attacks on Rudy come from supporters of various Democratic interest groups (which, as the case may be, happens to be true).
Paradoxically, Rudy would have a tougher time running against Obama, not Hillary. Obama is the definite "future" candidate in the Democratic Party and would be able to turn the page from the Nineties in ways that Hillary can't. And yes, Condi has been mentioned again and again as one of the top drawer picks for the Nominee (the other being Jeb Bush). Craziness has nothing to do with it.

"the facts as I see them" =

"the facts as I see them" = "opinion"

Facts have special status here. What I saw what a bunch of interpretations that require you to believe a lot of assertions that, frankly, strike me as absurd. 

Being a Black partisan space, if you are not coming from that perspective you'll likely find it uncomfortable after a short while. I don't think you're a Black partisan and I only think it fair to warn you because you CAN affect how we react to what you say by choosing your words well.

Alan Keyes...

Was a political racketeer. He gulled all sorts of grabastic fools into supporting his various campaigns-but they were all rackets, every one of them. I know a Republican political operative who worked his Maryland Senate race back in the nineties. Keyes lost by several trillion votes. Still, this guy has faith in Alan Keyes.

Someone would win a Pulitzer Prize reporting on whatever happened to all the cash that went into Keyes' various con jo..er, campaigns. 
Alan Keyes got the call from an Illionois Republican Party that was completely out to lunch. He went on about abortion and school choice and all the things that Activists like and didn't talk about the fact that he was a carpetbagger from Maryland who needed a job. It was like taking candy from babies. Obama murdered him, and rightly so. 
We in the Republican Party keep Alan around as a warning about what not to do in politics. Don't scream. Don't preach. Don't wear hideously ugly sweaters on cable TV. Don't act as if every campaign is the turning point in a vast moral crisis of the age. Voters are smarter than that. Only Alan thinks that they're not, so he continues to run his con, and gets white conservatives to give him money. It's a huge joke. 
This is all you need to know about how good a candidate is Alan Keyes: if they held an election in Hiroshima, Alan Keyes would lose to Paul Tibbets. 

Of course they strike you as absurd.

You are, in all probability, a Democrat. You don't see me speculating about the inner workings of the Donkey Party, now do you? Of course not.

I was in Sarasota nine months ago after watching the Republican house and senate candidates get hosed. I was talking to a very senior Republican operative with several decades experience who, like me, had started out on local races and had ended up doing the Presidential gig. We were both celebrating Rumsfeld's departure. But I digress. He had seen, for example, how Giuliani was received on the circuit in Florida, a bellweather state if there ever was one. He was the most popular draw not just in Florida, but in the Deep South.
It was then we both figured out that Rudy was the strongest horse, although all the Movement Money was moving to Mitt Romney at the time. 
I take my leave of you for now. I've probably worn out my welcome, as I suspect differing ideological viewpoints are not welcome here. When all is said and done, you're really more like Free Republic or Daily Kos than you may want to admit. However, allow me to suggest the following: what you think you know is based on past experiences that may be subject to rapid changes that are happening in both political parties, mine especially. The bottom line is that our grass roots are moving faster than our Washington Party, and nobody's figured that out yet except Giuliani. I don't believe that Democrats anticipated this, and I expect that both parties, not just yours, will be in for some horrific surprises next year.  

Heh

"That they settled on Alan Keyes shows how racialistic the Republican party is. "

There's more to the selection of Keyes to run a clown show campaign than simpleminded racism.

Obama's most powerful backer was the moderate GOP Chicago Tribune, which completely destroyed Obama's two most formidible centimillionair rivals. The Illinois GOP leadership had already torpedoed their own freshman incumbent, Senator Peter Fitzgerald, for bringing in an outsider as Federal prosecutor ( Patrick Fitzgerald, no relation, who is now in the process of throwing large numbers of Democratic and Republican politicians in jail). After the Trib ruined Jack Ryan, no top tier GOP politician cared to seek the nomination ( and they asked everyone with a "name") and the other rich guy running, the ice cream tycoon, Jim Oberweis, self-destructed as a lightweight right-winger.

Keyes got the nod partly for being a black conservative, partly for being an irresponsible loose cannon (entertainment value) and partly becuse being from out-of-state meant his landslide loss would not bring the stock of any Illinois Republican bigwigs down with him or aggravate the ongoing split between moderate GOP machine "regulars" and the militantly anti-abortionist, social conservative, United Republican Fund faction. The latter, usually bitter critics of the party leadership, was even kind of pleased because of Keyes pro-Life zealotry met their litmus test.

I take my leave of you for


I take my leave of you for now. I've probably worn out my welcome, as I suspect differing ideological viewpoints are not welcome here.

I was about to suggest you get a blog...

Republicans are not welcome until I see proof they've abandoned the Southern Strategy and the constant attacks on Black folks. However, as I said, if you choose your words correctly and don't try to take over the joint, you could hang. Individuals have proven to be cool...others have proven to have a disruptive agenda.

I was told by a Republican here, on this site, that the Republican platform means nothing. To flip from Bush to Giuliani verifies that.

When all is said and done, you're really more like Free Republic or Daily Kos than you may want to admit.

I have a metaphor that a programmer would understand.

Suppose you were on a Perl mailing list, and every time someone asks a question this guy pops up and says, "Here's how you do it in PHP!" He'd not be long for the list.

Arrogance

Please cut the self-righteousness. I was trying to have a reasonable poltical discussion with people here. I'm not being arrogant at all, just stating the facts as I see them. I can't help how you react to that. Sorry.

When you come on a website where many of us have been posting for a while and presume to tell us by implication that your opinions carry more weight than ours do because you have been involved in politics and instruct us as to the veracity of the New York Times then you are being arrogant. I am willing to discuss issues with you but don't try blowing smoke up my ass and convincing me that you're setting the world on fire.

Another Reason Why I Welcome Your Departure

...you're really more like Free Republic or Daily Kos than you may want to admit.

I can't speak for others but one of the reasons I post my opinions here is precisely because it is not like Free Republic or Daily Kos. I'm not a Democratic Party partisan; never have been.I don't think most folks who put in time here are.

LOL!

Well...I'm certainly not.

Please cut the

"Please cut the self-righteousness. I was trying to have a reasonable poltical discussion with people here. I'm not being arrogant at all, just stating the facts as I see them. I can't help how you react to that. Sorry".

 Did anyone accuse this guy of arrogance, or respond to his comment in a self-righteous manner? I didn't see that. I think he came here "primed", if you know what I mean. He commented on a post about Rice at Temple3, and started off with "Yes, but you're a leftist...". I think he has only one frame of reference, which most black folks don't fit into, so all he knows to do is think "leftist".

I suspect he's a guerilla

I suspect he's a guerilla marketer working the blogs for the PR firm that's trying to reshape her image.

J' Accuse

I accused him of being arrogant because he is arrogant. I continually find it interesting that ideological activists working on behalf of the Republican Party are genuinely not able to deal with black folks whose thinking about political issues are divorced from the daily and weekly talking points drafted by the public relations specialists employed by the Democratic and Republican parties.

This is especially true for black and white Republican activists. They seem incapable of arguing about a position on its merits with black partisans without constantly trying to inject our arguments with equine genes or shape them to fit into the talking points of their own arguments. They are simply not able to conceive that there exists black people who are not slavishly devoted to the Democratic Party and are not interested in advancing the Democratic Party's interests. P6 is correct in labling the Republican Party as "racialistic." The drones in the Republican beehive truly believe that any black person who is not a registered Republican must be a Democratic Party partisan.

 

Crack Head Giuliani Troll

Where did that ass come from? Scratch that - I see your comment. Probably right. Guerrilla marketer. I'm 'bout to delete his ignant Section 8 ass. That qualifies as SPAM where I come from.

I figured he fit right in

I figured he fit right in with the object lesson provided by the Imus shock troopers. It's the only reason I let the comments pass.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye