With a New Speech, Clinton Lays Out Goals as President
By PATRICK HEALY
PORTSMOUTH, N.H., Sept. 2 — Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York unveiled a new stump speech on Sunday, outlining the “four big goals” she would have as president and saying she was willing to “work within the system” and make “principled compromises” to achieve them.
Praising the leadership styles of Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson, Mrs. Clinton described herself as a pragmatist and an alliance-builder. Without naming names, she said her strategies would yield more results than those of her two chief rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina.
“From my time in the White House and in the Senate, I learned you bring change by working in the system established by the Constitution,” Mrs. Clinton said at an early afternoon rally in Concord, drawing a pointed contrast to the outsider messages of Mr. Obama and Mr. Edwards. Referring to the Roosevelts and Johnson, she said, “They got big things done because they knew it wasn’t just about the dream, it’s about the results.”
“I want to work within the system,” Mrs. Clinton said. “You can’t pretend the system doesn’t exist.”
Mrs. Clinton, who has won praise from some Republican senators for working with them on legislation, said she would try to follow that approach as president, but without sacrificing important values like preserving Social Security and protecting abortion rights.
“You have to know when to stick to your principles and fight,” she said, “and know when to make principled compromises.”
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
When have the Republicans
When have the Republicans made principled compromises?
Answer: When they slit Senator Larry Craig's throat and threw him in the ditch and gave Senator David Vitter a free pass.
The more Senator Clinton talks the less she convinces me that she is the one.
Same ole nonsense.....
First off, the title of this article was right-on! I do not understand why people don't research these people running for ANY office and see the lies, inconsistencies, corporate-pandering, and their anti-"average American" ways (if any average folk are left after the catastrophe we are about to unlease with ANOTHER illegal, immoral war in the Middle East). I don't even have the time to outline this lady's faults starting with her support of the lying, war-mongering, tax-stealing thugs running this country. Disgusting. And don't give me that liberal nonsense about her and her husband, rather do some research and educate yourself. Puhleeze.