“I think that fantasy must possess the author and simply use him,” she said in an interview with Horn Book magazine in 1983. “I know that is true of ‘A Wrinkle in Time.’ I cannot possibly tell you how I came to write it. It was simply a book I had to write. I had no choice.
“It was only after it was written that I realized what some of it meant.”...
The book used concepts that Ms. L’Engle said she had plucked from Einstein’s theory of relativity and Planck’s quantum theory, almost flaunting her frequent assertion that children’s literature is literature too difficult for adults to understand. She also characterized the book as her refutation of ideas of German theologians.
Madeleine L’Engle, Children’s Writer, Is Dead
By DOUGLAS MARTIN
Madeleine L’Engle, who in writing more than 60 books, including childhood fables, religious meditations and science fiction, weaved emotional tapestries transcending genre and generation, died Thursday in Connecticut. She was 88.
Her death, of natural causes, was announced today by her publisher, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ms. L’Engle (pronounced LENG-el) was best known for her children’s classic, “A Wrinkle in Time,” which won the John Newbery Award as the best children’s book of 1963. By 2004, it had sold more than 6 million copies, was in its 67th printing and was still selling 15,000 copies a year.
Her works — poetry, plays, autobiography and books on prayer — were deeply, quixotically personal. But it was in her vivid children’s characters that readers most clearly glimpsed her passionate search for the questions that mattered most. She sometimes spoke of her writing as if she were taking dictation from her subconscious.
“Of course I’m Meg,” Ms. L’Engle said about the beloved protagonist of “A Wrinkle in Time.”
The “St. James Guide to Children’s Writers” called Ms. L’Engle “one of the truly important writers of juvenile fiction in recent decades.” Such accolades did not come from pulling punches: “Wrinkle” is one of the most banned books because of its treatment of the deity.
“It was a dark and stormy night,” it begins, repeating the line of a 19th- century novelist Edward George Bulwer-Lytton, and presaging the immortal sentence that Snoopy, the inspiration-challenged beagle of the Peanuts cartoon, would type again and again. After the opening, “Wrinkle,” quite literally, takes off. Meg Murray, with help from her psychic baby brother, uses time travel and extrasensory perception to rescue her father, a gifted scientist, from a planet controlled by the Dark Thing. She does so through the power of love.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
she's somewhere in a wrinkle
I must have been all of 10 years old when I checked that book out from my school library, took it home, curled up in bed, and read myself happily out of my mind. Rest in peace Madeline, for I truly loved your book.
Do you think J.K. Rowling
Do you think J.K. Rowling has or will attain this kind of eminence? Will the Harry Potter books stand the test of time once the commercial phenomenon has abated?
the wrinkle in time series
the wrinkle in time series and the harry potter series are very very different animals. i wouldn't compare them. i too remember reading l'engle's work like it was yesterday. even though yesterday in this case was some thirty years ago.
About J.K. Rowling
I believe Harry Potter will stand the test of time for this reason: her 'themes' are really timeless, and all the people who are reading it now, will one day grow up, have children, and want a common experience with their children, and read those stories to them or with them. She might not be blazing hot, but her books will be on the shelves in the youth section 20 years from now, the same way that Judy Blume's books are now.
Here's the difference (and I
Here's the difference (and I assume that rikyrah is referring to Rowling when she says "she might not be blazing hot") between the two authors.
L'engle is a speculative fiction writer, or rather WAS. She played with ideas of time and space that were and in some ways still are cutting edge. When I read WRINKLE IN TIME in the 1st or 2nd grade I didn't have any idea what a tesseract was...but neither did my parents.
Rowling is a traditional fantasy writer. Most fantasies are by their nature conservative. They don't introduce new ideas as much as they try to refigure old ones.
I like the Potter series a great deal, and wished for a moment that I could have read that series as a child did. So this isn't a knock on Rowling.