Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

You don't get it


Instead of black voters, call them the Halle Berry/Mariah Carey/Tiger Woods voters. Instead of the Latino vote, re-brand it as the Jessica Alba/Jimmy Smits vote.

You really, really don't get it.

I've been hoping for a hidden, vivid strain in my family, which is the color of the Wonder Bread I grew up eating.

Or maybe you do and it scares the piss out of you.

Mitochondrial politics
Presidential candidates and celebrities bend fuzzy ideas of race and ethnic identity to their benefit.
Patt Morrison
September 20, 2007

Here's what to watch for at next week's GOP minority-issues presidential debate at a historically black college in Baltimore: empty chairs. All four top Republicans have "scheduling conflicts."

Even Republicans get that this is a problem. "We sound like we don't want black people to vote for us," former congressman Jack Kemp told the Washington Post. "What are we going to do -- meet in a country club in the suburbs one day? "

He's right about the country club part. But maybe rounding the bases at "the black debate" or "the brown debate" as a way to win votes -- for either party -- is looking as dated as Kemp worries that the GOP could become.

Get with it. Instead of black voters, call them the Halle Berry/Mariah Carey/Tiger Woods voters. Instead of the Latino vote, re-brand it as the Jessica Alba/Jimmy Smits vote.

Berry, daughter of a white mother and black father, identifies herself as black. Carey is variously listed as African American, Irish American and Long Island American. Woods has said he's "Cablinasian" -- Caucasian, black, Native American and Asian. Alba is Latino Franco Danish; Smits is Dutch Surinamese Puerto Rican. (You almost -- almost -- have to feel sorry for politicians. Once upon a time, ethnic politics was as easy as wearing a green tie in the St. Patrick's Day parade.)

What do race and ethnicity mean now? "Identity politics" is becoming just however people choose to identify themselves. In 2000, when the U.S. Census began letting people check more than one box for "race," nearly 7 million people did. People have sniped about Berry calling herself black and about Woods not calling himself black. And there's debate among minority voters over whether Democratic candidate Bill Richardson is Latino enough or whether Barack Obama is black enough (meaning not skin color but whether Obama is authentically at one with the African American slave experience). This, at the same time that mainstream pollsters still wonder whether Obama and Richardson are too black and too Latino to win.

Seventy, 80 years ago, Obama and Woods and Berry would have had no choice. Many states practiced the "one-drop rule" -- a fraction of "black blood" made you completely and legally black.

These days, when celebrities and garden-variety people can choose to classify themselves racially or ethnically on the strength of only a fractional claim to that group, they're turning the one-drop rule on its head, mocking America's "what are you?" race obsession.

You can see where this is going. Race could be so . . . 20th century.

I've been hoping for a hidden, vivid strain in my family, which is the color of the Wonder Bread I grew up eating. An unsuspected DNA legacy might open up a career in politics for me. And I could check a lot more boxes on the census form.

Shiiiiiiiiit

I don't think so...still too many niggahs white folks and others ain't got no interest in bonin, let alone marryin'...and until them black folk is all dead, it's gonna be on - like popcorn in Jena.

Why are profiles of

Why are profiles of bi-racial celebrities so much more compelling to some people than empirical analysis?

More "attractive" more compelling...

Halle - Data?

Data - Halle?

Ummm? Dunno.

I once heard it said that all the words spoken in a 30 minute news program would fit on the first page of the New York Times.  Well, if you do that 300 times a year for 10-15-20-50 years, you might want to look at "bi-racial celebrities" too.   

I know it was a rhetorical question, but...

 

BTW

I don't know if posting pics is verboten - but since the capacity was there, I took the liberty. Please feel free to remove from YOUR site - although I can't imagine why you'd do that.

If she was nekkid I'd

If she was nekkid I'd probably...unpublish it.

I Wouldn't

do you like that...you have a reputation to maintain.

(btw - roll over the pic) 

There are some in the white

There are some in the white intellectual establishment who reject affirmative action in favor of promoting interracial marriage. At this point I can't recall too many names, but I do know Michael Lind argued this position in his book The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution.  I also recall hearing this same argument from a Harvard law professor.   

Here is a link to Lind's book  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Next_American_Nation:_The_New_Nationalism_and_the_Fourth_American_Revolution     

The level of seriousness they have in reversing the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow is indicated in their support of an utterly impractical solution. 

Sex obsessed? or...

obsessed with White Supremacy and the White Privilege it brings is to suggest that the only solution is to have one big orgy so Whites will never have to face the prospect of not being in control.  If they can run things then no existing group can.  How you like them apples?

Backs against the wall, Whites say, "We have to f-ck our way out of this!"

Funny.  I just saw a post where someone made that kind of comment regarding Jena with the standard claim that "racism will always be around until we're all brown."  Some people are so ignorant and apparently never heard of colorism.  How brown are you? 

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye