The official narrative on Jena has been decided. There were nooses hung, then six months later a white kid got jumped.
Find me an article less than a week old that says anything different. And I'd rather think there was a meeting where this was decided than think so many white folks coincidentally decided to ignore the exact same information.
This ignorance is promoted when the New York Times gives Reed Walters a platform to present his spin unchallenged. However, by overlaying his explanation of things on the most detailed description of events I can find, we can still see where the problem is and how is is being hidden. We see strong evidence that equal protection under the law is not afforded the Black community in Jena.
Many in Jena's black community wanted the three white students expelled. But when the white superintendent and other school administrators investigated, they decided the nooses were a prank. Instead of expulsion or arrest, the three received in-school suspension.
This is the sin at the root of all the commotion. Do not lose track of this. Consider Walters' own opinion
If those who committed that act considered it a prank, their sense of humor is seriously distorted. It was mean-spirited and deserves the condemnation of all decent people.
This means the superintendent and other school administrators, who thought it was a prank, are mean-spirited, deserve condemnation...and are still running the school.
I would like to take this opportunity to make clear that hangman's nooses and burning crosses are to Black people as swastikas are to Jews. You know damn well you'd find charges to press against people who hung swastikas where Jewish people congregated.
Assuming you let them in your neighborhood, of course.
But things didn't calm down. Some whites felt triumphant; some blacks were resentful. Fights began to break out at the high school. But that year, the football team was having an unusually good season and the black athletes were a major reason why. So while there were fights throughout the fall, nobody wanted to take any action that would hurt the team.
It is not a coincidence that everyone who felt triumphant was white, nor that everyone who felt resentful was Black. Whether conscious intimidation or a lengthy Freudian slip, it was what Walters projected.
Am I ignoring the poor victim, Justin Barker, in all this?
Yes, just as WE are ignoring Robert Bailey.
The next night, 16-year-old Robert Bailey and a few black friends tried to enter a party attended mostly by whites. When Bailey got inside, he was attacked and beaten.
No one charged for that assault.
The next day, tensions escalated at a local convenience store. Bailey exchanged words with a white student who had been at the party. The white boy ran back to his truck and pulled out a pistol grip shotgun. Bailey ran after him and wrestled him for the gun.
After some scuffling, Bailey and his friends took the gun away and brought it home. Bailey was eventually charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who pulled the weapon was not charged at all.
Though Bailey was charged for daring defend himself. We're even going to ignore that Justin Barker admitted in public that he was an accessory after the fact, at minimum, to that assault.
The following Monday, Dec.4, a white student named Justin Barker was loudly bragging to friends in the school hallway that Robert Bailey had been whipped by a white man on Friday night.
Barker should be questioned as to the identity of those who assaulted Mr. Bailey, and charged with obstruction of justice if he refuses to identify them...and if he was just lying he should be charged with inciting a race riot.
But instead, a sneaker was declared a deadly weapon in order to justify trying these six young men as adults. Focusing on Mychel Bell is a diversion because others of them were treated that way. Bell just happened to be unable to raise the bond, and the first to go to trail.
It is within the power of Mr. Walters to identify and punish everyone involved, including the white folks. If he does not, he is using his prosecutorial discretion to ignore the crimes of the white kids that were involved. The purest example of personal racism bleeding over into institutional racism that can be found.
[P6: minor edits for clarity]
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Obvious Double Standard of Justice
P6, You are on point. We need to get back to Jena 6 before the public forgets that this thing is not over with. A giant protest means nothing when nothing changes. And so far, the racists are holding their line.
P6, on themoney again. Thank you so much.
Keep on it.
I've been meaning to ask. At
I've been meaning to ask. At the outset, one of the things you noted was that the coverage that sharpton brought to the issue revealed one of the major reasons you don't hate on him (like me for example).
But it's becoming apparent that, just like the cotton case, both he and jackson were late to this issue as well.
Their central role historically has been two fold.
1. Bring media coverage to issues.
2. Help those who cannot help themselves.
I used to buy the first--though I still had problems. I never bought the second.
I don't think even 1 applies anymore.
Lester Spence, PhD
http://lesterspence.com
http://flickr.com/photos/unbowed
Death comes without the beating of drums
Mr. Spence, I see where you're going, but we're not
there yet.
Some have argued that this is the first instance of the ' new media' and it's ability to harnass the grass roots. I disagree, I think Imus was truly the first case, but I won't argue about it. The Jena Six is the beginning of something different. Of something organic and grassroots,and both Jesse and Al had to book to CATCH the bus this time, they are still needed, because of issue #1-by the time they got involved and 'brought media coverage' about it, the background of this case was well known throughout the country. But, it needs to be taken to the next level, and that's where Jesse and Al come into play. But, no doubt, they were so not the genesis of this protest and outrage.