Can Obama Sell to Blacks and Whites?
October 26, 2007 10:02 PM ET | Bedard, PaulJust in time for the early primaries and caucuses in January, Simon & Schuster is shopping a book for media outlets to serialize that declares Sen. Barack Obama won't win because he's caught between strategies to woo blacks and whites. A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can't Win, by race and culture scholar Shelby Steele, helps to explain the candidate's bid to stay above politics. While we aren't allowed to quote from the early excerpts, a Simon & Schuster letter explains that Obama "walks in an impossible political territory where any expression of what he truly feels puts him in jeopardy with one much-needed constituency or another." Steele argues that Obama is in a pickle. With whites, Obama bargains, telling them: "I will not rub America's ugly history of racism in your face if you will not hold my race against me." To win blacks, the publisher's letter says, Obama must challenge whites on race and demand they back "black-friendly policies." Steele gives examples of who uses the dueling strategies: Oprah Winfrey and the Rev. Al Sharpton.
I'll keep my eyes open for the excerpts and the book. This is a case that can be made honestly. It is also a case into which you can pack as much socioeconomic presumptions and political bombast as you'd like.
If Steele is smart, he'll make the case honestly. Fewer people would like the book but more people would be convinced by it. Which is not to say it will change all that many minds either way.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Steele argues that Obama is
Steele argues that Obama is in a pickle. With whites, Obama bargains, telling them: "I will not rub America's ugly history of racism in your face if you will not hold my race against me." To win blacks, the publisher's letter says, Obama must challenge whites on race and demand they back "black-friendly policies."
If that's an accurate of Steele's position on the issue, then he probably is arguing dishonestly. America's HISTORY of racism?
He's saying he thinks that's
He's saying he thinks that's Obama's approach to white folks. He can say that honestly, independant of his own beliefs. He'll just be right or wrong.
I don't expect an honest argument, though. The timing of the book suggests it will be all partisan rhetoric.
Honesty and Steele?
BWA HA HA HA HA HA
Hilarious.
Come
continued
Come on, P6. You and I can write this book for Steele. It's not the book YOU would write, or I would write, but I think we can pretty much figure out what STEELE is going to write.
I don't think it will be honest or balanced, let alone fair.
Any questions?
Thanks for finding that. So
Thanks for finding that.
So now we know he's not just a sell-out but a fool as well. If he had dealt with the issue honestly he could have regained a little respect from Black folks. But that wasn't his goal...and I'm sure he'd consider me a fool for questioning the value he received in exchange for his soul.
Did you catch this part?
Without going into the Sowell-Thernstrom complex, what's an "individual" doing talking about a WE??
Of course, it would be too much to ask how such an individual arrived at his conclusions about terrorism. We know his audience won't question it. Hell, he'll claim he's Black then, so he should know. His 'truths' are self-evident because he's Black... when he wants to be.
I can't help but think that there's a third category - something else besides challengers and bargainers. Steele wears neither 'masks' making no demands at all -- whether a challenge or a bargain -- on his beloved White society, so sell-out would seem appropriate.
I think the third category
I think the third category is "People who won't fuck with you if you don't fuck with them."
Um...I'll say it...I told you so.
told ya.
I think the third category
Is that how you classify Shelby Steele? He sure as hell keeps fuckin' with Black folk who really haven't done anything to him except exist. Maybe that's an assault in and of itself. Anyway, Category 3 sounds like the reason for 1 and 2.
Is that how you classify
Nah, that's me. Steele surrendered his Brother Card. I'm not up for force folks to be Black when they don't want to be. That's why I never refer to his race.
I'm not up for force folks
That's why I want to know how/why such an 'individual' talks about "WE." I'm into forcing people who don't want to be Black to sticking to their individualism or whatever else they want to identify with or claim.
Something people overlook is
I just had to post it. I'll reserve comment and only say that it's apparent that he's rehashing this same kind of rhetoric
I'm into forcing people who
Okay! I call it "respecting their opinion."
Did you see this post?
The Definition of a Sellout
http://www.alternet.org/rights/20624/?page=1
Three years ago, sis.
Three years ago, sis. Probably linked it, but I don't remember that much.
Old Shelby started the campaign off in Canada
Looks like Ole Shelby's kicked off his campaign in Canada:
http://communities.canada.com/nationalpost/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2007/10/30/marni-soupcoff-on-shelby-steele-in-toronto.aspx
By Mr. Steele’s measure, Mr. Obama is an “iconic negro” — a super-bargainer who can make whites feel comfortable and hopeful — but also someone who craves a strong black identity.
It’s a plausible enough assessment of one man, but Mr. Steele seemed to be arguing that almost all American blacks fall into one of the two categories. When an audience member asked if Mr. Steele could name any blacks who don’t “wear a mask” — other than U.S. Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, whom Mr. Steele mentioned as an example — Mr. Steele seemed temporarily stumped.
He eventually added U.S. secretary of state Condoleezza Rice to the list when prodded, but not quickly enough to allay the impression that his own typography might be taken as an unintended form of racism itself — a simplistic way of accusing people of a lack of authenticity based on the colour of their skin.
Had to linkify that bad
Had to linkify that bad boy.
It is entirely possible no one in the USofA wants to carry that serializion of his book.
Steele wears no mask?
Soupcoff done lost his damn mind with that. Dude is feigning Black while staying true to his White self.
If I were to go there, I'd
If I were to go there, I'd say he's a man without a nation feigning whiteness. Being me, I just think he values his income and place in society more than anything else.
I have to admit, I was LOL at the Canadian recount
The obviousness in it was just so, refreshing.
A self-loathing Sambo like Uncle Clarence is the ONLY Black man in A-merry-ca who isn't wearing a mask.
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
" A man without a nation feigning whiteness."
Why feign, because he can never be White physically? Mentally, he's been there, P6.
White is no more physical
White is no more physical than Black. But other than that, yeah. He can feign whiteness by surrounding himself with white people who are familiar with him. But I dare him to walk though Howard Beach alone at night...
WAY to many places where his assumed Whiteness will not just go unrecognized, but will be actively denied, for him to ever really be white.
As for the article, this was the amazing line to me.
TOTALLY misunderstood this.
I believe he delivered a practiced anwser to an inevitable question. The anger at being forced to say a negro thing leaked out.
I'm very serious. Remember What Black Men Think. It was a fairly successful experiment.