You know what's wrong with this, and ALL the media coverage I've seen today?
For a while, it looked like Obama could be the rare African-American leader whose race was nearly invisible – and he may still be. He’s post-Civil Rights, Oprah-branded, with that classically American blend of a mother from the heartland and a father from a distant shore. And after that Iowa victory speech, people felt something had passed into our collective rear-view mirror, without actually saying what that something was.
Now it looks like every mention of race – from the overblown dust-up with Senator Hillary Clinton this week to the calculated comments comparing him to Sidney Poitier – is bad for Obama. A victory in South Carolina, with its heavy black vote, will be seen as one-dimensional.
He needs people to look at him and see John Kennedy, or The Beatles, or Tiger Woods in his first Master’s tournament. He needs people to see youth, a break with the past, style under pressure.
When they see black this or black that — even a positive black first — it’s trouble.
It's written as though this is a law of nature. No one says anything about the immorality of the situation.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
It's like listening to the
It's like listening to the politicians of the 1850s who cringed every time they had to mention the issue of slavery.
Were there any of those?
Were there any of those?
Golly, thanks Mr. Egan!
Mr. Egan seems to have figured out exactly what Mr. Obama can and can't do if he's going to be successful in his campaign. That's awfully generous of him.
Great ghost of Jehosephat! That was an awful column.
It Worked
It worked.
Got that black mojo working
Got that black mojo working overtime.
Black Blackie Blackety Black Black
P6 I think of statesmen like
P6
I think of statesmen like Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and Stephen Douglas who believed that free states and slave states should learn to co-exist and did not want the question of slavery to create divisions which would destroy national greatness.