It's important to note that these criteria describe an overarching pattern: a group needs to score high on at least 10 or 12 of these to be within even hailing distance of "cult" status. On the other hand, just about any group trying to create social change is going to partake of at least a few of these qualities.
The Cult of Obama
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
-- by Sara
Every political news outlet, from the networks to the blogs, is abuzz today with the question: Is the Obama phenomenon a cult?
People -- particularly Hillary partisans -- are eagerly putting this idea out there. I want to make it very clear before I get started that I'm not a partisan of either candidate: there are things about them both that have my skepticism pegged to the limit. Personally, I'm for the Democrat. But when it comes to the topic of what is or ain't a cult -- that's something I know something about. Or, at least, I seem to understand it a bit better than most of the people who are bandying the term around today.
Any number of religious sociologists have assembled various tools and devices to be used in assessing whether or not a group can be classified as a "cult." (So have many members of what can only be termed the "anti-cult industry," which largely comprises conservative Christians seeking to scare their fellow believers into staying in the fold. One must be careful.) Perhaps the most comprehensive of the bunch is the one assembled by folklorist Dr. P.E.I Bonewits in 1979, which laid out 18 behaviors that are common to religious cults:
1. internal control
2. external control
3. wisdom or knowledge claimed by leaders
4. wisdom or knowledge credited to leaders
5. dogma
6. recruiting
7. front groups
8. wealth
9. sexual manipulation
10. sexual favoritism
11. censorship
12. isolation
13. dropout control
14. violence
15. paranoia
16. grimness
17. surrender of will
18. hypocrisy
It's important to note that these criteria describe an overarching pattern: a group needs to score high on at least 10 or 12 of these to be within even hailing distance of "cult" status. On the other hand, just about any group trying to create social change is going to partake of at least a few of these qualities. When people are setting out on a new course, they tend to put out tremendous amounts of energy. They trust their leaders, ascribe all manner of wisdom and magical power to them, accept their words as dogma, and enthusiastically recruit new members. (Or, in this case, voters: Obama is, after all, running a political campaign.) It's offputting at best and worrisome at worst; but as you can see from the list, it takes a whole lot more than that to make any group qualify as a full-blown cult.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
I call "projection"
Basically you have 216 million Usonian adults,* of whom approximately 64% oppose the Iraq War; 49% presently believe the US government is NOT improving conditions in Iraq and winding down the conflict. That's 105 million US nationals who have no one to turn to on this issue but Sen. Barack Obama. As for HRC's putative economic populism, I can think of no better gold standard than Barbara Ehrenreich (who hesitated a long time because of her disappointment in all the candidates' [inter alia] healthcare plans).
Look, I have never met him, I don't hate Hillary Clinton and never have, and I don't expect to get anything directly as a result of Obama's electoral victory in November (ensha'allah!). I don't work in his campaign, my wife doesn't either, he's not from California or Washington, etc. etc. Yet somehow I was shoehorned into the teeming masses of Usonian voters who regard the Iraq War as the crucial decision, and who have always seen Obama as the one plausible candidate who was not tarred with support for the War. In a way, this election has turned into a three way battle between the [militarism + neoliberalism] vs. [militarism + populism] vs. [multilateralism + populism] camps. The last one is authentically popular, while the other two have been limping along on coercion and blackmail for a long time.
I've read the article at Orcinus and I think that Sara's essay is not bad but I think the list needs more clarification. Here's P.E. Bonewit's checklist in full .
___________________________________________
*As of 2000, approx. 71.489% of Usonians were >19 years old; as of 15 Feb. '08, there were about 303.4 million Usonians .
Jesus God, that fits the
Jesus God, that fits the Bush Administration more than anything else...
Indeed
Indeed. Going though the list, I'd say the Conservative Movement 's constituent groups score quite high except for number 6, 10, 13, and possibly 16.