Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

You must be out of your mind

Maybe next election, okay? 

Read Their Lips

A year ago, before Barack Obama’s prodigious fund-raising powers were clocked in at $1 million a day, the senator made a great show out of raising a good idea: He would take the narrower road of public financing in the general election if he secured the nomination and his opponent did the same. Senator John McCain, then a long shot, agreed. Mr. Obama even secured a ruling from the Federal Election Commission that he could return unused private donations and then accept public financing.

Well, Mr. McCain is now the presumptive Republican nominee and says he is eager to take Mr. Obama up on the idea if he beats Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Sounds good? Not so fast.

Representatives of Mr. Obama are cautiously saying this plan was an option, not a pledge, and it will not be definitively addressed unless Mr. Obama secures the nomination. An idea floated by a contender is now too “hypothetical” for a front-runner.

Campaign seconds will spar eagerly over what “option” and “pledge” mean. But researchers from government watchdog groups found a candidates’ forum from last November where Senator Obama answered with a firm “yes” when asked if he would participate in public financing, should the Republican nominee do the same. He promised to “aggressively pursue” this route.

We urge Mr. Obama to return to that position, and Mrs. Clinton to follow suit. She has not made a firm commitment, even as she endorses an updating of public financing subsidies to make it more attractive. After the hundreds of millons in private donations being splurged on the primaries, public financing would limit the general election nominees to $85 million each. This seems generous enough, particularly with the political parties and independent groups free to spend even more.

Senator Obama should accept

Senator Obama should accept public financing when this newspaper apologizes for supporting America's invasion of Iraq. The entire editorial board of the paper is, as a group, a collection of sanctimonious hypocrites. They love to get on their high horse of integrity when they want to call someone else to account but they ignore their own failures to protect the public from bounders, liars, rascals, grifters, hustlers and public policies that are from jump street insane.

As I wrote in my own post....

HELL.TO.THE.NAW.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye