Others.
Usually consideration of such roles focus on leadership positions. Black folks' hierarchies are plugged into the main hierarchy, and have no "head." I suspect that's part of the reason for our obsession with leaders.
Since I'm not an organization it's easy for me. It's a "keep your eyes on the prize" thing...if you're not an abject hater and can help me reach the next goal, cool. But my thing here is kind of chaotic. In organization terms, I feel like there has to be some role for 'others' because you really are trying to affect their understanding and behavior as much as ours. It just doesn't automatically have to be a decision making position (I am, in fact, somewhat suspicious of carpet baggers that come to lead instead of learn). Neither does it have to be a peon position. Truth is, it doesn't have to exist be a fixed role. [P6: edited for clarity]
I feel the nature of the organization is the critical issue. If it has a useful goal and stays true to it, it's insulated against the vagarities of individuals to some degree.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
I'm pretty down on the whole
I'm pretty down on the whole "intersectionality" meme. It's psyschotherapy as political activism in my view. I think folks should work out their personal issues on their own time. We make it too easy for people to make our struggle their personal playground. I think you nailed the solution; there has to be a useful goal. We have to get in the habit of being insistent that anyone who claims to be representing on our behalf damn well better have some measurable objectives that are directly relevant to our collective needs and some metrics for evaluating progress, or at least be in the process of developing them. Otherwise, find another field to play in.