Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

The medical equivalent of subprime mortgages

Moreover, insurers say, co-payments and deductibles are generally lower in private plans than in traditional Medicare. In data submitted to the government, insurers estimated that their beneficiaries paid, on average, $49 a month in such costs, or 42 percent of what they would have paid in traditional Medicare.

But the Government Accountability Office said the experience of particular beneficiaries might not match the average, so their out-of-pocket costs could substantially exceed those in traditional Medicare. 

...among Medicare plans with out-of-pocket limits, 29 percent exclude the cost of some cancer drugs, 23 percent exclude the cost of some mental health services and 21 percent exclude home health care expenses.

Private Medicare Plans’ Cost Questioned
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON — Private Medicare plans often cost beneficiaries more than the traditional government-run Medicare program, Congressional investigators say.

Many private plans advertise extra benefits and low costs. But in a report to be issued Thursday, the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, says that many people in private plans face higher costs for home health care, nursing homes and some hospital stays.

About one-fifth of the 44 million Medicare beneficiaries — 9 million people — are in private plans, known as Medicare Advantage plans.

The report says, “Medicare spends more per beneficiary in Medicare Advantage than it does for beneficiaries in the original Medicare fee-for-service program, at an estimated additional cost to Medicare of $54 billion from 2009 through 2012.”

Bush administration officials and insurance executives say the private plans provide a bargain. “Medicare Advantage plans are offering an average of approximately $1,100 in additional annual value to beneficiaries in terms of cost savings and added benefits,” said Kerry N. Weems, the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Moreover, insurers say, co-payments and deductibles are generally lower in private plans than in traditional Medicare. In data submitted to the government, insurers estimated that their beneficiaries paid, on average, $49 a month in such costs, or 42 percent of what they would have paid in traditional Medicare.

But the Government Accountability Office said the experience of particular beneficiaries might not match the average, so their out-of-pocket costs could substantially exceed those in traditional Medicare.

Last year, it said, “19 percent of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were in plans that projected higher cost-sharing for home health services, and 16 percent of beneficiaries were in plans that projected higher cost-sharing for inpatient services.

Insurers often boast that they protect Medicare beneficiaries against high out-of-pocket costs by setting annual limits.

The Government Accountability Office found that “48 percent of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were in plans that had an out-of-pocket maximum.” The limits typically ranged from $2,750 to $4,600 a year and averaged about $3,500.

But, the report said, certain costs are not counted toward the out-of-pocket limits established by some insurers. Thus, it said, among Medicare plans with out-of-pocket limits, 29 percent exclude the cost of some cancer drugs, 23 percent exclude the cost of some mental health services and 21 percent exclude home health care expenses.

“Beneficiaries who use these excluded services may pay more in total cost-sharing than is indicated by the plan’s out-of-pocket maximum,” the report said.

Medicare makes substantial contributions to the earnings of insurers like Humana and UnitedHealth.

And The Problem Is?

It's a private plan. So the problem is?

They're not exposig all the

You DO see the parallel.

Sorry, I'm suffering from

Sorry, I'm suffering from the flu. But, huh?

Okay... First problem: They

Okay...

First problem: They aren't exposing the full terms of the policy, and there are way to many policies to choose from for a human to review. The situation is custom made for fraud. Obvious parallel to the mortgage industry.

Second problem: The consciously created ignorance guarantees an inefficient market (and therefore inordinate profits for someone). Obvious parallel to the mortgage industry.

Third problem: It is NOT optional. Most folks simply can't afford medical care and pray they never need it, insurance or no. Close parallel to the mortgage industry.

Fourth problem: If you can't trust your medical provider or mortgage broker, you're totally fucked. So mortgage brokers (like politicians and used car salesmen) work more the appearance of trust. Medical providers, though...you probably never met your anesthesiologist. Couldn't name the radiology guy that interpreted your x-rays. And they all work on a profit motive like everyone else in the USofA. Only parallel to the mortgage industry is how totally you get screwed.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye