![]() |
author: Houston A. Baker asin: 0231139640 binding: Hardcover list price: $24.95 USD amazon price: $16.47 USD |
Betrayal: How Black Intellectuals Have Abandoned the Ideals of the Civil Rights Era by Houston A. Baker isn’t properly described by its title because it covers a bit more than Black intellectuals. It reminds me a lot of Harold Cruse’s Crisis of the Negro Intellectual. It’s roughly three parts analysis and one part vengeance. Prof. Baker takes aim at a wide array of target, from John McWhorter (for failing to live up to Dr. King’s example) to Irving Kristol (for creating the political movement he feels was key in undermining Black interest). He draws on the writings of Dr. King and W.E.B. DuBois to establish his position, yet never claims to present more than his personal reactions.
If you’re going to read the book you should start at the beginning. The introduction, Little Africa, shows you to the shaping forces in his life, the greatest of them being his parents, while Jail introduces his understanding of Dr. King and his legacy (there‘s a touch of hagiography here, but if anyone deserves it, Dr. King does). Between them you will be firmly grounded in the Professor's world view and comfortable with his use of Black metaphors, or you will be so lost, you will just put the book down. Putting it down would be a choice, not a necessity; if you get lost it will be because you wandered off the trail he marks. Maybe I feel that way because, to me, the markers define a trail I’m familiar with. And the last three chapters, American Myth, and Prison (excluding the conclusion, sub-headed What Then Must We Do?), are more about what Black intellectuals have not done.
The good parts, the fun parts, lay between these two sections. This is where Prof. Baker takes aim at those who profit by the fact that we are still troubled, in ways that increase that trouble. He shows how the fathers of neo-conservatism grew out of the liberal movement that was inspired by the Black liberation movement. He shows how, from a Black experiential perspective, it is really a very short walk from your typical mainstream liberal position to a neocon disdain for specifically addressing damage inflicted on the Black communities (in fact, that proof can be reduced to one of the many Martin Luther King Jr. quotes he provides: “Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash.”).
He challenges Michael Dyson and Cornel West more harshly than I would (not that I don’t have issues, I just wouldn’t be that harsh) while acknowledging they likely mean well. But in Have Mask Will Travel, Dr. West gets nailed again for questionable material in a jointly written book with Dr. Henry Lewis Gates. And Dr. Gates has a particularly hard way to go here. I believe this chapter was written for Dr. Gates’ “benefit.”
But the full measure of his ire is reserved for Shelby Steele, Stephen Carter and John McWhorter, each of whom gets a full chapter of comeuppance.
My problems with the book are minor. Prof. Baker truly holds Dr. King as his model and personal idol. The Dr. King he presents is the one we are currently in the process of recovering from the mangled mess Conservatives (and Black Conservatives in particular) have made of his legacy; as such he mentions, rather than explains, the larger Black Power movement. No disrespect there, I believe. The history of that movement, too, needs recovery and that work is underway. And because the prior chapters focus so much on humans, the last chapters (which speak to institutional issues that are not being addressed) feel, for all their importance, like they were tacked onto the end for completeness.
As I said, though, these are just nits. Betrayal is more personal than scholarly, but no less serious for all that. I don’t think it will change anyone’s mind one way or the other, but if you find yourself asking, “What’s wrong with that boy?” when listening to Black Conservatives, you will likely find Betrayal informative and amusing at once.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Little Africa...
This is a far more comprehensive review than he was able to go into on NPR the other day:
http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=89434473&m=89434461&live=1
(…Listening to his description of Little Africa reminded me of tales my father would tell me of the need for he and his siblings to escape from Iowa, where they were born and raised. It wasn’t IF they got out, it was WHEN they got out and WHERE they were going to go when they did! There WAS no plan B!)
I'm much more inclined to get a copy of this now.
I'm curious to hear what he has to say about Shelby Steele, Stephen Carter and John McWhorter, but Carter in particular.
(...I'm still trying to find time to finish his book, 'The Emperor of Ocean Park.' I'm 3/4 of the way through and I have a feeling the ending will be extremely unsatisfying.)
I agree with his assertions on racism. It’s worse because it’s far more subtle now.
I try to reinforce in my children that no matter how well they think they may get along with some people, to always be conscious of the fact that there are going to be people who will make presumptions of who they are based on no more than misconceptions they have formed based on no more than biased media coverage and a limited interaction with people outside their immediate social circles and to recognize it for what it is.
But that digression aside, I have a running mental commitment to try and find a copy of a copy of a documentary titled ‘Hosea in His Own Words’ that ran on Georgia Public Broadcasting some years back.
I don’t think Williams has ever gotten nearly the notoriety that some of the others in the civil rights movement did and had I never moved to Atlanta, would probably still be in the dark to his efforts as well.
His story is a compelling one and speaks for itself, but what I was struck by more than anything was towards the end of the documentary, he spoke of how MLK had gathered them altogether not long before his passing, almost as Jesus had done at the last supper and told them that with his demise, there would be many who would come to them within the inner circle and implore them to become agents of change within political electorate system but that they should resist at all costs and remain agents of change from the grass root level, because it would effectively divide and conquer the cause. They would be enticed with the personal gain these pursuits would provide, but this personal gain would allow them to be co-opted by the very system they were trying to engage and do nothing more than neuter their effectiveness.
Supposedly King went on in this fashion for some time in effort to make his point.
But, as Williams noted, King’s body was not even in the ground long enough for it to grow cold, then it seemed as if everyone within the inner circle was running for some kind of public office and effectively destroyed the movement.
P6, thanks for the
P6, thanks for the thoughtful review. I got my copy last week, but I haven't had a chance to read it yet.
If you're interested
Here is a video of a recent panel which featured Prof. Baker.
It's pretty evident that
It's pretty evident that Baker is far more engaging and dynamic in person!
(...I’ll have to find time to study his literary works even more!)
Thanks!
Columbia University Press'
Columbia University Press' blog linked here, and to submariner's video.