A regular reader forwarded me a link to Ms. Huffington's complaints about the way Obama is campaigning. It's an expansion on her appearance on Stephanopolis' show this weekend. He finds it a convincing explanation of why his own enthusiasm is waning.
In a Los Angeles Times article detailing Obama's attempts at "shifting toward the center," Matt Bennett of the centrist think tank Third Way says that Obama is a "good politician. He's doing all he can to make sure people know he would govern as a post-partisan moderate."
But isn't being a "good politician" as it's meant here exactly what Obama defined himself as being against? Instead of Third Way think tankers, Obama should listen to this guy:
"What's stopped us is the failure of leadership, the smallness of our politics -- the ease with which we're distracted by the petty and trivial, our chronic avoidance of tough decisions, our preference for scoring cheap political points instead of rolling up our sleeves and building a working consensus to tackle big problems.... The time for that politics is over. It's time to turn the page."
That was Barack Obama in February of 2007, announcing his run for the White House. "I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington," he said that day, "but I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change."
Was that just "overheated and amplified" rhetoric?
The Obama brand has always been about inspiration, a new kind of politics, the audacity of hope, and "change we can believe in." I like that brand. More importantly, voters -- especially unlikely voters -- like that brand.
Pulling it off the shelf and replacing it with a political product geared to pleasing America's vacillating swing voters -- the ones who will be most susceptible to the fear-mongering avalanche that has already begun -- would be a fatal blunder.
Let me say this: I've watched Obama since he emerged on the national stage. His actions don't surprise me at all.I can only conclude I have failed to assume something everyone else feels is obviously relevant.
Systems have weight, events have momentum. Managing change is like steering garbage barges. I have always seen the probability of "something awesome" as the smallest fraction of its possibility. Call me a cynic.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
I'm shocked, shocked
This is why I hate liberals. Obama is following the pattern of every successful candidate. JFK ran and won on the verifiably false platform of a missile gap relative to the Soviet Union. He assiduously avoided being identified with the Civil Rights Movement. And he deepened American involvement in Southeast Asia.
Brother Bobby came to prominence as an advisor to Joseph McCarthy. Rick Perlstein's Nixonland describes an RFK cutting his hair short, giving tough speeches on law and order, decrying welfare handouts, and conspicuously avoiding cameras during his forays into black neighborhoods. RFK was the consumate political infighter always conscious of accomodating party bosses.
Huffington may want to talk shit now but I never saw or read anything expressing her support for Dennis Kucinich. Same goes for Paul Krugman and other self-avowed liberals and progressives.