Robert J. Samuelson bemoans our lack of understanding of the economy.
All the bad habits of recent years -- excessive borrowing by consumers and money managers, careless and reckless lending -- grew in a climate when gains seemed ordained. Even after the "tech bubble" burst in 2000, stock prices at year-end 2002 were seven times their year-end 1981 level. Home prices increased steadily; in the 1990s, they rose 45 percent.
Prosperity, apparently forgiving of mistakes, bred the complacency that undid prosperity. On bad mortgages, losses could be recovered by selling the homes at higher values. Thus rationalized, bad loans were made. Some stocks might decline, but over time, most would rise. Risk seemed to recede, so investors and money managers undertook riskier strategies.
What will emerge from these shattered illusions? Will the crash stir social unrest, abroad if not here? Will Americans become so thrifty that they hamper recovery? Will economic nationalism surge? How will capitalism be reshaped? Much depends on whether the frantic policies to combat the recession succeed. Probably they will, but there are no guarantees. Our ignorance is humbling.
The reason we are so lost is that so many lies are accepted as fact. I suspect that we would stop doing things like calling hunger "food insecurity," creating things like "core inflation" and using it everywhere "inflation" was used for a couple of decades, and creating business plans that depend on the ignorance of one's customers, you might just be able to see valid patterns.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo