Quote of note:
The NIH proposal calls for researchers to submit their papers to the agency after they have been accepted for publication and edited by the accepting journal.
By placing the responsibility on researchers, the policy avoids the prospect of NIH trying to tell the journals to share those papers.
Articles would not be made public by the NIH for six months -- a compromise position, Zerhouni said, to give the journals time to profit from the work.
After that, they would be available for free on the NIH Web-based database, PubMed Central.
NIH proposes free public access to scientific research
Critics say plan may put journals out of business
By Rick Weiss, Washington Post | September 7, 2004
WASHINGTON -- The National Institutes of Health has proposed a major policy change that would require all scientists who receive funding from the agency to make the results of their research available to the public for free.
The proposal, posted on the agency's website late Friday and subject to a 60-day public comment period, would mark a significant departure from current practice, in which the scientific journals that publish those results retain control over that information. Subscriptions to those journals can run into the thousands of dollars.
Nonsubscribers wishing to get individual articles typically must pay about $30 each -- fees that can quickly add up for someone trying to learn about a newly diagnosed disease.
Although patient advocacy groups and other organizations have been lobbying hard for the proposed shift, the scientific publishing industry and related interests are crying foul.
The move could drive some journals out of business, they say, and bankrupt some scientific societies that are dependent on journal profits to fulfill their research and education missions.
Whatever the outcome, both sides agree change is inevitable, given society's rising expectations of easy access to information from the Internet and the enormous interest in health -- a topic that NIH officials say accounts for about 40 percent of all Internet queries.
''The status quo is not an option," NIH director Elias A. Zerhouni said last week at a meeting on the agency's Bethesda campus.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
The Death of the Digital Divide
TrackBack from Cobb: