Black Conservatives make my head hurt
There's this website, The Black Conservative that's just, well, stupid. I was going to do this great introduction, but in the end the site is best summed up as, well, stupid. At least if it's an attempt to speak to Black folks, and I don't think it is. I can't remember the last Black Conservative© I felt wanted to help Black people rather than make guilty liberal white folks change their political party.
Okay, Glen Loury.
Anyway, the first article on the site today is an excellent example of why I feel the site is just, well, stupid. "The Black KKKommentator" is written by Bob Parks, who in the process demonstrates why he is a former California congressional candidate rather than a former (or current) California congressperson.To begin with, he's a Black supremacist.
Yes, he wrote that. It's an example of the careless tossing about of rhetoric that fills the article.
"We all look alike?"
And in the conservative world, how much attention would I get with my independant thought? WHITE people aren't allowed independant thought in the Conservative movement. It's all about that discipline, remember?
Since Conservative house negros have the choice of private school for their kids too, let's just say all parents want the same choice house negros have, okay?
Then I can shoot that down too. Because parents want their kids to have quality education. If this could be had within the public school system, no one would complain. And history shows it can be, unless one wants to argue that the public school system has ALWAYS been a failure…an argument I haven't seen put forth yet.
Here comes something REALLY stupid.
- BC
In the liberal world one should not expect high school students be capable of better legal research. In fact, since we are only talking about black people, there should not be any expectations at all. Just a stroke on the back and a doggie treat.
In any reasonable world one should not expect high school students to be capable of better legal research than a judge's colleagues. If Mr. Parks truly as such expectations of high school students he is ignorant of what legal research is and involves.
But what if that means ALLOWING the teachers to teach, rather than forcing them? What if it means up to date equipment and books? Or an acknowledgement of environmental issues that impact students? Suppose removing obstacles is easier than driving each individual student around or over the same obstacles? What if it involves more carrot and less stick?
And what "liberal government" would that be?
