User loginNavigationLive Discussions
Most popular threads
For entertainment onlyWeekly Archives08/28/05 - 09/03/05
08/21/05 - 08/27/05 08/14/05 - 08/20/05 08/07/05 - 08/13/05 07/31/05 - 08/06/05 07/24/05 - 07/30/05 07/17/05 - 07/23/05 07/10/05 - 07/16/05 07/03/05 - 07/09/05 06/26/05 - 07/02/05 06/19/05 - 06/25/05 06/12/05 - 06/18/05 06/05/05 - 06/11/05 05/29/05 - 06/04/05 05/22/05 - 05/28/05 05/15/05 - 05/21/05 05/08/05 - 05/14/05 05/01/05 - 05/07/05 04/24/05 - 04/30/05 04/17/05 - 04/23/05 04/10/05 - 04/16/05 04/03/05 - 04/09/05 03/27/05 - 04/02/05 03/20/05 - 03/26/05 03/13/05 - 03/19/05 03/06/05 - 03/12/05 more... Blog linksA Skeptical Blog NathanNewman.org Tech Notes |
We recommendGoogle searchTip jarDropping KnowledgeLibrary of Congress African American Odyssey Link CollectionsNews sourcesOn CultureReality checksThe Public LibraryWho's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 2 users and 87 guests online.
Online users:
...Syndicate |
Week of September 26, 2004 to October 02, 2004Typical NY Post nonsenseby Prometheus 6
October 3, 2004 - 2:51am. on Politics Sorry guys, there's no help for him
Let's be clear. You can't have a war on terror. Terror has no weapon; terror has no body. You can only have a war on people. It's like guns. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Right? So why are we talking about a war against fear instead of a war against that which we fear. A war against fear would mean doing things so we don't have to be afraid. That is NOT what George Bush is doing. In fact, it is the opposite of what George Bush is doing. So yes, I would say George Bush has an excellent understanding of the relationship of Iraq to the "War on Terror." George Bush is using Iraq to justify continuing the "War on Terror" and using "War on Terror" to justify controlling Iraq. As far as relying on U.N. disapprobation to disarm Saddam Hussein… NEWS FLASH: THE NATION OF IRAQ HAD NO WEAPONS. IRAQ HAD BEEN FORCED TO DISARM. WITH SANCTIONS, FLYOVERS AND REGULAR BOMBING, IRAQIS COULD DO US NO HARM.
Why should he? HOW COULD HE? The country of Iraq had NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. But this…THIS is the most amazingly blatant lie in the editorial:
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. But being a progressive, I know Conservatives aren't prepared to take my word for it. So I asked my uncle about it.
I also asked my uncle to compare the coalition that participated in Operation Enduring Freedom with the one that invaded Iraq. Of the Afghanistan coalition, he said:
Significant drop. Since Uncle Sam doesn't want t talk about this, I had to check alternate sources.
Well, if you ARE safer it's not because of anything George Bush has doneby Prometheus 6
October 3, 2004 - 1:52am. on War Guantanamo has 'failed to prevent terror attacks' Prisoner interrogations at Guantánamo Bay, the controversial US military detention centre where guards have been accused of brutality and torture, have not prevented a single terrorist attack, according to a senior Pentagon intelligence officer who worked at the heart of the US war on terror. Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Christino, who retired last June after 20 years in military intelligence, says that President George W Bush and US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have 'wildly exaggerated' their intelligence value. Christino's revelations, to be published this week in Guantánamo: America's War on Human Rights, by British journalist David Rose, are supported by three further intelligence officials. Christino also disclosed that the 'screening' process in Afghanistan which determined whether detainees were sent to Guantánamo was 'hopelessly flawed from the get-go'. Looks like Kodak is becoming an intellectual property providerby Prometheus 6
October 3, 2004 - 1:51am. on Tech Kodak wins Java lawsuit Eastman Kodak Co. will return to U.S. District Court next week to seek $1 billion in damages from Sun Microsystems Inc. now that a federal jury has ruled in its favor in a dispute over the Java computer language. The jury decided in Rochester on Friday that Sun infringed on technology belonging to Kodak when it developed and introduced Java more than a decade ago. The computer language is now used heavily by software developers, on the Internet and in computer schools. Kodak praised the verdict and said it was part of an aggressive push to convert innovations — both homegrown and purchased — into real money. The company over the past several years has been issuing licenses, filing lawsuits, forming spinoff companies and finding other uses for its technologies. No commentby Prometheus 6
October 3, 2004 - 1:45am. on Seen online
If Republicans are right and Bush won on substance, we should be REALLY angryby Prometheus 6
October 2, 2004 - 7:18pm. on War Talking Points Memo has a really good point
The last sentence is reason enough to linkby Prometheus 6
October 2, 2004 - 5:55pm. on Politics Delay Over? Laura Rozen says the rumors are out that Delay is 'finished'. This article suggests as much. Remember, Delay and bullies like him thrive on perceptions of |