A little from the other side

Rwanda's Latest Ethnic Cleansing~
True reconciliation is impossible until the Hutus' suffering is also recognized.
By Michael J. Kavanagh
Posted Wednesday, April 7, 2004, at 3:18 PM PT

Today marks the 10th anniversary of the beginning of the Rwandan genocide. While the world looked on unashamed, the Hutu Power movement went on a 100-day killing spree to exterminate the minority Tutsi population and any political opposition by moderate Hutus. It took a Tutsi-led rebel force called the Rwandan Patriotic Front to put an end to the killing and start the long, slow process of rebuilding this small African nation.

Over the past 10 years, the RPF—now the democratically elected government—has made incredible progress in Rwanda. It has established a government dedicated to "unity and reconciliation" whose rhetoric is high-minded and enlightened. Women make up a greater percentage of the Rwandan parliament then anywhere else in the world (they are required by law to fill 30 percent of all government positions). And security in Rwanda is impressive; I feel safer walking around the streets of Kigali at night than I do in my Brooklyn neighborhood.

…If such social engineering could ever work, Rwanda—a country where insensate respect for authority has often been cited as a main reason why so many people could suddenly turn around and kill neighbors, friends, even family members—is the place. But in fact, ethnicity is as present as ever in Rwanda. If Rwandans don't use the words "Tutsi" and "Hutu," it's because they've found other ways of saying them.

Take, for example, rescapé—roughly, "survivor"—the widely used term for those who escaped the genocide. Rescapé is reserved solely for Tutsis. In a recent interview in Kigali, my translator—without prompting—told a Hutu woman who had suggested that she herself was a rescapé that such a thing was impossible because she wasn't Tutsi.

She looked at him, and then at me, with a mixture of confusion and pain. She'd done time in the refugee camps, lost family members, fought off rape attempts, and was now dirt-poor after 10 years of supporting her husband in jail. In her mind, she was a survivor.

"But maman, survivors are only Tutsis," my translator explained once more—again without prompting.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on April 8, 2004 - 7:59am :: Africa and the African Diaspora
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The need for a more balanced approach to reporting on the Rwandan situation is one I've been stressing for a long time now. People keep insisting on making the Tutsis out as modern day Jews, and the Hutus as African Nazis, when the reality is a lot uglier once we take a bit of history into consideration.

Neighboring Burundi has also seen its share of genocide, but in that case it's all been Hutus dying at the hands of Tutsis, a reality that it would be silly to expect Hutus living in Rwanda to be unaware of.

I'm not saying that this justifies the murder of 800,000 people, but what I'm trying to get at is that what's going on in Rwanda-Burundi is more like tit-for-tat than Jews vs. Nazis or Turks vs. Armenians. Allowing Kagame and his Tutsi cohorts to monopolize power and resources in Rwanda, in the name of "national unity", is only setting things up for another disaster down the line.

Posted by  Abiola Lapite (not verified) on April 8, 2004 - 8:45am.

Totally agreed. I know colonial/national borders were drawn up to split and group mutally hostile tribes and a tribe will be a minority in one nation and the majority right next door. And I know grief in one is very, very likely to spill over those borders.

Posted by  P6 (not verified) on April 8, 2004 - 10:11am.

The lessons from this should apply to the new Iraq under UN supervision.

IF such ever occurs any time soon. Unless somehow Sunni and Shi'ia become forever reconciled after having united vs. Bush/Bremer/Chalabi

Posted by  Mr.Murder (not verified) on April 11, 2004 - 2:47am.