The study was commissioned by the nation’s largest health-related philanthropy, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which on Thursday planned to announce a three-year, $300 million initiative intended to narrow health care disparities across lines of race and geography. Officials said it would be the largest effort to improve health care quality ever undertaken by a charity in the United States.
Two "for the record" statements. I appreciate the effort to "narrow" health care disparities, but it's like Hillary said about universal health care: if your goal is to eliminate the problem, that must be your goal. Eliminating health care disparities is NOT a national goal at this point.
Second point: This could become a series. Not beating up on Obama, just pointing out that voting for President isn't all that needs doing...and it's stuff we can't do alone. This, for instance, is a problem that can't be lifted by all the bootstraps that ever existed.
Research Finds Wide Disparities in Health Care by Race and Region
By KEVIN SACK
Race and place of residence can have a staggering impact on the course and quality of the medical treatment a patient receives, according to new research showing that blacks with diabetes or vascular disease are nearly five times more likely than whites to have a leg amputated and that women in Mississippi are far less likely to have mammograms than those in Maine.
The study, by researchers at Dartmouth, examined Medicare claims for evidence of racial and geographic disparities and found that on a variety of quality indices, blacks typically were less likely to receive recommended care than whites within a given region. But the most striking disparities were found from place to place.